Bush's Legacy of Deceit: A
Firefighter Speaks-out on the election, national security and Iraq,
by Bruce Monson, Freethought Firefighters, 10/27/04
George W. Bush will never admit it, but there were at least three deadly
mistakes committed by him in the run-up to the war: inadequate body armor,
insufficient manpower and no exit strategy – three things that firefighters
know more than a little about.
Firefighters to
go after Bush 'loudly and aggressively',
by Klaus Marre, The Hill, 3/11/04
When, in the future, the
Bush campaign is “using firefighters for their photo op,” the
International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) “will loudly and
aggressively” make known the administration’s cuts to federal funds for
first responders, Harold Schaitberger, the group’s general president, told
The Hill.
Firefighters File Lawsuit over
Chaplains in Their Ranks,
New York
Times, 5/26/03
Six California firefighters have gone to federal
court seeking an end to the chaplain's corps of the California Department of Forestry and
Fire Prevention, saying it impermissibly mingles church and state.
The
Madness of President George,
byLlewellyn
H. Rockwell, Jr., LewRockwell.com, 4/16/04
Hail Lord Farquaad, the
Despicable!, by Bruce Monson, Freethought
Firefighters, 3/26/04
One of the classic scenes in the movie
Shrek
is when Lord Farquaad—the insecure, egotistical, size-compensating
ruler of Dulac—has organized a duel among his shining knights to determine
which of them will gain "the honor—no, no, no—the privilege to go forth
and rescue the lovely Princess Fiona from the fiery keep of the dragon."
As the duels are about to begin Farquaad proclaims, "Some of you may die.
But it's a sacrifice I am willing to make."
Richard Clarke KOs the Bushies;
The ex-terrorism official dazzles at the 9/11 commission hearings.
by Fred Kaplan, Slate, 3/24/04
Richard Clarke made his much-anticipated appearance
before the 9/11 commission this afternoon and, right out of the box,
delivered a stunning blow to the Bush administration—the political
equivalent of a first-round knockout.
Documentation of Plans to Crash Airplanes Into Buildings that Bush and Condi
Claim They Knew Nothing About: They Lie, Assassinate People's Characters
Instead of Refuting Their Evidence -- and They are, Most Dangerous to the
Nation, Incompetent.,
BuzzFlash editorial, 3/25/04
"(CBS) Two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, an analysis prepared for U.S.
intelligence warned that Osama bin Laden's terrorists could hijack an
airliner and fly it into government buildings like the Pentagon.
"Suicide bomber(s) belonging to al Qaeda's Martyrdom Battalion could
crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives (C-4 and semtex) into the
Pentagon, the headquarters of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or the
White House," the September 1999 report said.
The Bush administration has asserted that no one in government had
envisioned a suicide hijacking before it happened.
Willful Ignorance,
by David Corn, TomPaine.com, 3/16/04
A year ago—March 17, 2003, to be exact—George W. Bush
addressed the nation and the world. He gave Saddam Hussein 48 hours to get
out town or face a U.S. military invasion. To defend the war to come, Bush
declared, "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no
doubt that the Iraqi regime continues to possess and conceal some of the
most lethal weapons ever devised." There was nothing ambiguous here: "leaves
no doubt". Of all the false assertions—or lies—that Bush told before the
war, this one was perhaps the most important, for Bush was informing
Americans, citizens elsewhere, members of the U.S. armed forces about to be
placed in harm’s way and Iraqis who also would pay the ultimate price that
his actions, as controversial as they might be, were based on rock-solid,
you-can-take-it-to-the-bank information. In essence, Bush was saying we know
what we are doing and we know it is absolutely unavoidable.
Did Bush Press for Iraq-9/11 Link? CBS New York,
3/20/04
Clarke also tells CBS
News Correspondent Lesley Stahl that White House officials were tepid in
their response when he urged them months before Sept. 11 to meet to discuss
what he saw as a severe threat from al Qaeda.
"Frankly," he said, "I find it outrageous that the President is running for
re-election on the grounds that he's done such great things about terrorism.
He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have
done something to stop 9/11. Maybe. We'll never know."
Clarke went on to say, "I think he's done a terrible job on the war against
terrorism."
Clarke
Kent, by Billmon, The Whiskey Bar, 3/20/04
He's no mild-mannered reporter -- more like a human bulldozer -- but
Richard Clarke also appears to have ducked into a phone both and come out a
changed man. The former career securocrat has ripped off his suit and tie
and put on his tights and cape. And he's going after Shrub like Superman
going after one of his many imposters:
The Tax-Cut Con,
by Paul Krugman, New York Times Magazine, 9/14/03
A MUST READ!!!!!
This article was printed back in September, but its analysis is so
strong and its information so pertinent to the ramifications we will face as
a result of
the Bush administration's "starve-the-beast" policy of mega-spending and
mega-deficits, that it is quite simply a MUST READ--twice! (ffi)
New Evidence
Suggests that Kissinger Gave Okay to Argentine "Dirty War" That Killed
Hundreds and Hundreds of Dissenters, Some of Them Dropped In the Ocean,
Drugged and Alive, From Airplanes,
Miami Herald, 12/4/03
Well Duh!--as if it were ever really in doubt that this and other
atrocities were condoned or instigated by Kissinger and other imperialistic
cronies who have held power in previous--AND CURRENT--administration(s)! (ffi)
At the height of the Argentine military
junta's bloody ''dirty war'' against leftists in the 1970s, then-Secretary
of State Henry Kissinger told the Argentine foreign minister that ''we would
like you to succeed,'' a newly declassified U.S. document reveals.
The transcript of the meeting between
Kissinger and Navy Adm. César Augusto Guzzetti in New York on Oct. 7, 1976,
is the first documentary evidence that the Gerald Ford administration
approved of the junta's harsh tactics, which led to the deaths or
''disappearance'' of some 30,000 people from 1975 to 1983.
War Wounds:
Who really supports the troops?,
by
Alan Bisbort, Hartford Advocate,
November 27, 2003
I mourn the deaths of these soldiers. With each death, in fact, my
loathing for the leaders who put them in harm's way grows. Millions of us
"supported the troops" for the entire year leading up to this debacle in
Iraq by screaming ourselves hoarse that our best and bravest NOT be put in
harm's way. At least, not for such deceptive and ever-changing reasons
given by a commander in chief who went AWOL from his own military duties
and a vice president who "had other things" to attend to while 55,000
members of his own generation died in the rice paddies of Southeast Asia.
Iraq Becomes Operation 'Sitting Duck', by Carl Hiaasen,
The Miami Herald, 11/30/03
This
holiday weekend concludes the bloodiest month for U.S. forces since the
so-called end of major combat. More than 60 U.S. soldiers have been killed
by hostile fire in November.
How the
Bush Cartel Shafts Our Veterans, by Buzzflash,
11/11/03
Today it's clear to many veterans that the Bush administration and
Republicans in Congress think of them on other days of the year besides
Veterans Day. They're thinking of veterans as they work to cut off VA
healthcare. They're thinking of veterans when they refuse to address
lingering health problems from the first Gulf War. They're thinking of
veterans when they block full retirement and disability benefits. And
they're thinking of veterans when Bush decides, yet again, not to attend a
soldier's funeral or pay a visit to those who are recovering from injuries
at Walter Reed Army Medical Center just a few miles from the White House.
Case for war confected, say top US officials,
by Andrew
Gumbel (Los Angeles), The Independent's, 11/9/03
An unprecedented array of US
intelligence professionals, diplomats and former Pentagon officials have
gone on record to lambast the Bush administration for its distortion of
the case for war against Iraq. In their view, the very foundations of
intelligence-gathering have been damaged in ways that could take years,
even decades, to repair.
Blueprint
For a Mess, by David Rieff, New York Times Magazine,
11/2/03
Despite administration
claims, it is simply not true that no one could have predicted the chaos
that ensued after the fall of Saddam Hussein. In fact, many officials in
the United States, both military and civilian, as well as many Iraqi
exiles, predicted quite accurately the perilous state of things that
exists in Iraq today. There was ample warning, both on the basis of the
specifics of Iraq and the precedent of other postwar deployments -- in
Panama, Kosovo and elsewhere -- that the situation in postwar Iraq was
going to be difficult and might become unmanageable. What went wrong was
not that no one could know or that no one spoke out. What went wrong is
that the voices of Iraq experts, of the State Department almost in its
entirety and, indeed, of important segments of the uniformed military were
ignored.
Bill
Moyers is Insightful, Erudite, Impassioned, Brilliant and the Host of PBS'
"NOW", BuzzFlash interview, 10/28/03
Watching the opening of the second game of the World Series, I was struck
at how effectively the Fox producers mixed patriotic imagery with prurient
promotions for upcoming programming in what amounted to a sedation of the
viewer's critical faculty. It's a fitting metaphor, I think, for what's
happening in politics as the mainstream media have been silenced and the
partisan media have turned propaganda into "news." Wave the flag, stroke
the sentiments, stir the prejudices -- and you can keep the masses
distracted from the real game happening out of sight, behind closed doors
in boardrooms and oval offices.
9/11: A Firefighter
Speaks Out, BuzzFlash, 9/10/03
Last night as I sat with my fellow firefighters at our regular weekly training,
we ended the evening with a tribute to September 11, and the 343 fallen firefighters. We
had a choice: we could watch the presentation or sit it out. I almost sat out, but decided
to participate. I feel a little better able to look back now; a little stronger, less
shell-shocked, clearer in perspective.
Don't
Reinforce Failure in Iraq, by Brian Cloughley, Daily Times 9/10/03
Turkey was criticised by deputy defense
secretary Wolfowitz because its military would not overrule parliaments decision to
stay out of the war. This representative of democracy declared its perfectly
appropriate, especially in your system, for the military to say it was in Turkeys
interests to support the United States. No it isnt: not in Turkey or anywhere
else. The US demand was rejected in the Turkish Parliament by a democratic vote. It is
monstrous for the Bush administration to suggest that this should have been overturned by
the military.
The
Stench, Two Years On, by Maureen
Farrell, BuzzFlash, 9/10/03
The further we move away
from the tragedy, the less confident we are. Initially, comparisons between 911 and the
Reichstag fire fueled distrust, as did surreal speculation that the attacks were an
updated version of Operation Northwoods [LINK].
But none of that seemed really real for most of us. As more reasons to distrust the
president emerge, however, we're presented with solid evidence that something just isn't
right. And it's become increasingly clear that this administration's loyalties don't lie
with the American public -- but with foreign oil mavens and its own corporate cronies.
My
response to the latest attempt at distraction by the Right-Wing fanatics: "Wake Up
Americans," by Bruce Monson FreethoughtFirefighters, Summer
2003
Unless you are one of the stalwarts still
conducting your correspondence via the snail mail method you will probably know what I'm
talking about when I say that every week or so someone (or perhaps multiple someones) will
see the need to demonstrate their "patriotic duty" by including your email
address among the multiple dozens of others on their "mass mailing" lists, and
treating you to the latest God-inspired evidence for the moral decay of society (of which
your heathen ways are no doubt a major contributor...), or another four legs good, two
legs bad diatribe showing how great the Republicans are and how bad everything
non-Republican is.
Greg Palast answers
"Was the Iraq War a Bush Cartel Effort to Divert Attention from Saudi Arabia, the
Home and Chief Financier of bin Laden?" BuzzFlash, 8/29/03
Well, its become a topic of
increasing speculation: Is the Bush Cartel war on Iraq a diversion from having the
American press and people demand answers about the Saudi financial support of al-Qaeda
and the fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were Saudis, as well as
bin Laden? Do the 28 Bush administration censored pages from the Congressional 9/11 report
reveal a much broader Saudi royal family involvement in financing charities linked to
terrorist groups? Why have so many connections between the Saudi family and terrorists
as well as the large number of Saudis in leadership position in terrorist groups
been swept under the rug by the Bush administration?
Die Laughing, by Chris Floyd, St. Petersburg Times, 9/2/03
[Ed. note: This article from Russia is biting, but the most important aspect is
the supporting evidentiary citation of sources at the end.]
Here's a headline you don't see every day: "War Criminals Hire War Criminals
to Hunt Down War Criminals."
Perhaps that's not the precise wording used by the Washington Post this
week, but it is the absolute essence of its story about the Bush Regime's new
campaign to put Saddam Hussein's murderous security forces on America's payroll.
Four 9/11 Moms Battle Bush, by
Gail Sheehy, New York Observer, 8/28/03
So afraid is the Bush administration of what
could be revealed by inquiries into its failures to protect Americans from terrorist
attack, it is unabashedly using Kremlin tactics to muzzle members of Congress and thwart
the current federal commission investigating the failures of Sept. 11. But there is at
least one force that the administration cannot scare off or shut up. They call themselves
"Just Four Moms from New Jersey," or simply "the girls."
Unprepared
For Peace in Iraq, by Senator Robert Byrd, Washington Post, 8/26/03
What has become tragically clear is that the
United States has no strong plan for turning Iraq over to the Iraqi people and is quickly
losing even its ability to maintain order. The administration is stumbling through the
dark, hoping by luck to find the lighted path to peace and stability.
Revisiting the
Case for War, by Joseph Cirincione and Dipali Mukhopadhyay, Foreign
Policy, Summer, 2003
In an effort to quell the controversy over
the 16 words in U.S. President George W. Bushs State of the Union
address, the White House declassified and released intelligence documents on July 18, 2003
to prove there was ample evidence that Saddam Hussein had a continuing and expanding
nuclear weapons program. Yet those same documents indicate that some senior officials had
serious doubts about the threat of Iraqs weapons of mass destruction and the
regimes links to al Qaeda. A look back at President Bushs October 7, 2002
speech in Cincinnati, Ohio, where he made a detailed case for war against Iraq, reveals
that what the president said did not always reflect what U.S. intelligence analysts
believed at that time.
Note: This is a progressive article that
will continue to be updated to reflect latest information and evidence.
Bush's
Mis-State-Ment Of The Union Fiasco, by Arianna Huffington, 7/16/03
Poor Karl Rove. He spends close to two years meticulously
staging photo ops and carefully crafting sound bites to create the image of President Bush
as a take-charge, man-the-controls, land-the-jet-on-the-deck-of-the-aircraft carrier,
"Bring 'em on" kind of leader. But now the latest revelations about the
Misstatement of the Union fiasco are threatening to bring back the old notion of W as a
bumbling, detached figurehead-in-chief.
And it's the president's own people who are painting this
unflattering portrait.
Bush
Faced Dwindlind Data on Iraq Nuclear Bid, By Walter Pincus,
Washington Post, 7/16/03
In recent days, as the Bush administration has defended
its assertion in the president's State of the Union address that Iraq had tried to buy
African uranium, officials have said it was only one bit of intelligence that indicated
former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was reconstituting his nuclear weapons program.
But a review of speeches and reports, plus interviews
with present and former administration officials and intelligence analysts, suggests that
between Oct. 7, when President Bush made a speech laying out the case for military action
against Hussein, and Jan. 28, when he gave his State of the Union address, almost all the
other evidence had either been undercut or disproved by U.N. inspectors in Iraq.
The
Attack Has Been Spectacular, by Maureen Farrell, BuzzFlash, 7/1/03
. . . But even if WMDs
aren't found (or planted), the Inquirer's Dick Polman assures that "Americans might
overlook Bush's claims because the war in Iraq was brief and had few U.S.
casualties." As a matter of course, Polman also compares George Bush's lies to Bill
Clinton's, as if saying "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" is
somehow comparable to spilling both blood and treasure. Given that thousands of Iraqis and
more than 200 Americans have already lost their lives (even as US soldiers are ambushed
and murdered daily) and that the illegal occupation of Iraq is expected to last somewhere
between 5 and 60 years, weighing the consequential trauma of Monica's soiled blue dress
against the long-term consequences of Bush Doctrine-related fabrications is like wondering
if Martha Stewart is as criminally diabolical as John Wayne Gacy. . . .
Ten Lessons of
the Iraq War, by David Krieger, 5/7/03
There are always lessons to be learned after a war. Often governments and pundits
focus only on lessons having to do with military strategies and tactics, such as troop
deployments, engagement in battles, bombing targets and the effectiveness of different
weapons systems. There are, of course, far bigger lessons to be learned, and here are some
of the principal ones from the Iraq War.
Of Human Shields, Collateral Damage and Consequences, by Bruce Monson, 3/15/03
Suppose there was a gunman (we'll call him a terrorist) holding a
group of school children hostage at a daycare center in your city. Let's say that
there are 60 children total in the school and the gunman is using 15 of them as a
"human shield" to discourage attacks against him from the police department and
their "laser-guided precision weapons." The media is outside.
Hysterical parents are outside. The place is surrounded.
===> See alsy my Dialogue with Lance Watts
RE: his rebuttal to this essay.
Secret Patriot Act II
Destroys Remaining US Liberty: Total Police State Takeover: The Secret Patriot Act II
Destroys What Is Left of American Liberty, By Alex Jones, infowars.com,
2/11/03
On February 7, 2003 the Center for
Public Integrity, a non-partisan public interest think-tank in DC, revealed the full text
of the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003. The classified document had been leaked
to them by an unnamed source inside the Federal government. The document consisted of a
33-page section by section analysis of the accompanying 87-page bill.
UK Anti-Saddam
"Smoking Gun" Document is a Plagiarized Scam: Cited By Powell In U.N. Speech,
by Michael White and Brian Whitaker, The Guardian, 2/7/03
>>>See this Also
Downing Street was last night plunged
into acute international embarrassment after it emerged that large parts of the British
government's latest dossier on Iraq - allegedly based on "intelligence material"
- were taken from published academic articles, some of them several years old.
Stating the
Obvious, by Paul Krugman, NY Times, 5/27/03
The lunatics are now in charge of the asylum." So
wrote the normally staid Financial Times, traditionally the voice of solid British
business opinion, when surveying last week's tax bill. Indeed, the legislation is doubly
absurd: the gimmicks used to make an $800-billion-plus tax cut carry an official price tag
of only $320 billion are a joke, yet the cost without the gimmicks is so large that the
nation can't possibly afford it while keeping its other promises.
But then maybe that's the point. The Financial Times
suggests that "more extreme Republicans" actually want a fiscal train wreck:
"Proposing to slash federal spending, particularly on social programs, is a tricky
electoral proposition, but a fiscal crisis offers the tantalizing prospect of forcing such
cuts through the back door."
The NeoCons: New Nazi-Lite Con Men Take Washington, by WAYNE MADSEN, 5/17/03
America's manipulative neo-conservatives,
who support unending aggression against any country that does not succumb to United States
political, economic, and military control and who, themselves, seized power in Washington
through electoral malfeasance, are taking a page from Nazi Germany's leaders in their
quest for world domination.
It is no coincidence that the neo-cons are worried about comparisons between their
policies and those of Hitler.
Ed Gernon, the Canadian executive producer of the upcoming CBS miniseries, "Hitler:
The Rise of Evil," was fired when he suggested similarities between the methods used
by both Hitler and Bush to wipe away civil liberties by playing on popular fear.
Where
is Bush Leading Us?, by Gary Hart, Boston Globe, 6/2/03
A short year and a half ago America was
astride the world like a moral colossus. Virtually the entire world united behind us in
our grim search for justice against Al Qaeda. Sometime last fall, however, when Saddam
replaced bin Laden as our white whale, we started on our own crusade and left the rest of
the world behind. You can either believe much of the rest of the world became, almost
overnight, obtuse and anti-American, or you can more plausibly believe we unilaterally
launched ourselves on a mission that made little sense to much of the rest of the world.
Smoke, Mirrors and
Conspiracy Kooks, by Maureen Farrell, BuzzFlash, 5/13/03
The U.S. version of the
Jessica Lynch saga features a damsel, distress, evil Iraqis, and heroic soldiers saving
the day. "The real 'Saving Pte. Lynch,' the Toronto Star counters, exposes this
scenario as a "grand myth." Citing testimony from doctors, nurses and Nasiriya
locals, the Star refutes America's official story, reporting that rather than being shot,
stabbed and tortured before being rescued from the clutches of brutal captors, Private
Lynch was actually injured in an auto mishap and was saved from the nurturing care of an
attending nurse. "It was so scary for her," Lynch's nurse Khalida Shinah said.
"Not only was she badly hurt, but she was in a strange country. I felt more like a
mother than a nurse. . .And at nights, I would sing her to sleep."
Upset by U.S. government
assertions that Lynch was abused during her time at the hospital, a teary-eyed Shinah
said, "This is a lie. But why ask me? Why don't you ask Jessica what kind of
treatment she received?" But unfortunately, Army spokesman Lt.-Col. Ryan Yantis
warned that, "Until such time as [Lynch] wants to talk - and that's going to be no
time soon, and it may be never at all - the press is simply going to have to wait."
The same day, FOX News reported, "Sources Say Jessica Lynch Has Amnesia."
Media Monopolies Have Muzzled Dissent, by Ian Masters, Los Angeles Times, 5/1/03
Totalitarian regimes don't tolerate any
distinction between journalism and propaganda, but in most democracies it is unprecedented
for the free press to abandon Joseph Pulitzer for the methods of Joseph Goebbels.
How did a born-again, family-values
administration get in bed with a purveyor of misogyny and mayhem, trash and titillation?
The common thread, for all the public piety, has to be the late Lee Atwater, who was
friend, mentor and role model to George W., Karl Rove and Roger Ailes, the head hound in
the Fox pound of junkyard attack-dog journalism.
AN OPEN LETTER TO MY CONGRESSMEN:
by Church Secretary, Church of the Bad News, Sunday,
March 30, 2003
It is with a somewhat heavy heart that I
write this letter to you; I fear that it is too late, or irrelevant besides.
Our nation has been hijacked by a cabal of individuals who have used the
highest office of our land, after securing it under circumstances which were dubious at
best, for the purpose of enriching and empowering their wealthy friends and acquaintances.
Of course, much of this enrichment and empowerment has been done through actions that have
served to greatly benefit the extremely wealthy and the corporate culture in general, at
the expense of our vital governmental infrastructures. In the process of misusing our
democracy for their own ends, these individuals have quite possibly (either through
neglect or cynical, malicious intent) left the door open for one of the worst terrorist
attacks our nation has ever seen.
Bush's speech signaled the end of rule of law,
By Craig Barnes, Santa Fe N.M., Denver Post
2/23/03
On Jan. 28, in one speech, George W. Bush threw away and
rejected all this that I had learned. He scorned the rationality of his opponents, scorned
the diplomatic process, scorned containment, condemned deterrence, declared the right of
pre-emptive aggressive war, implied a willingness to use nuclear weapons first and
authored a new doctrine of American imperialism for the Middle East.
Did You Get
That Right, Andy? (A Response to Andy Rooney on his 60 Minutes segment:
"France's Unpaid Debt"), by Bruce Monson, 2/16/03 «--- READ!
This is my letter to the CBS program 60 Minutes that I
wrote following their February 16 airing that found the sometimes funny satirist, Andy
Rooney, in rare form, though not for his humor. Rather, he presented some rather
invective mudslinging directed at France in the wake of that country's defiance of the
Bush administration, which he titled, "France's Unpaid Debt." For Rooney,
at least, the French "owe us [their] independence" and "have not
earned their right to oppose President Bush's plans to attack Iraq."
Superpower Gone
Ballistic, Acting very Roguish (Risks Tomorrows Super Bowl, Now That is Quite
Atrocious!), by Bruce
Monson, 1/30/03 «--- READ!
I saw an interesting commercial on the cable sports
channel ESPN this morning. It said: "Without sports there would be no next
year." I think they might be rightat least in America.
Secret Patriot Act II
Destroys Remaining US Liberty: Total Police State Takeover: The Secret Patriot Act II
Destroys What Is Left of American Liberty, By Alex Jones, Infowars.com, 2/11/03 «--- READ!
On February 7, 2003 the Center for Public Integrity, a
non-partisan public interest think-tank in DC, revealed the full text of the Domestic
Security Enhancement Act of 2003. The classified document had been leaked to them by an
unnamed source inside the Federal government. The document consisted of a 33-page section
by section analysis of the accompanying 87-page bill.
Axis of Twits, by
P.M. Carpenter, BuzzFlash.com, 2/14/03
Contrary to the president's repeated claims that a blow against Saddam
Hussein will be a blow against terrorism, the most recent Osama bin Laden audiotape
confirms that a blow against Saddam will be a gift to al Qaeda, more valuable in
propagandistic weight than U.S. airbases in Saudi Arabia.
The
United States of America has gone Mad, by The
Times, UK January 15, 2003
The reaction to 9/11 is
beyond anything Osama bin Laden could have hoped for in his nastiest dreams. As in
McCarthy times, the freedoms that have made America the envy of the world are being
systematically eroded. The combination of compliant US media and vested corporate
interests is once more ensuring that a debate that should be ringing out in every town
square is confined to the loftier columns of the East Coast press.
Secret
Government, National Public Radio's This American Life, Episode 229,
1/10/03 «---
LISTEN!
It's been said often that the Bush Administration is one
of the most secretive Presidencies ever. But really, just what does that mean? Three case
studies of some of the newly-minted secrets. A look at the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court of Review, a secret appeals court convened to settle a dispute between
a secret court and the Justice Department.
Act One: "Enemy Combatant";
American Citizens held without councel or charges, a look at Jose Padilla.
Act Two: Secret Trials and Deportations
Act Three: USA Patriot Act; Secret Wiretaps from
a Secret Court