No 'Signs' for the Pharisees? 

A Look at Luke 16:31

Home

 

AMANDA: One might speculate as to why God did not provide us categorical proof that would convince everyone that Jesus was divine and rose from the dead, or even that God Himself exists. But Jesus Himself points out in the story of the rich man and Lazarus, "If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead" (Luke 16:31).

BRUCE:  Nope.  Drop the bacon-bits and step away from the salad bar, Amanda!

First, let me emphasize that it is Christians like yourself, Amanda, that posit the extraordinary claim that their Jesus (and He alone, mind you) performs "miracles" in the world today!  But all you have to offer in the way of evidence for your "miracles" are assertions that are somehow always lacking in verifiable evidence; or to arbitrarily give Jesus credit for events that require nothing outside the natural world to account for.  In other words, your intense desire that Jesus and miracles be a reality mandates that you find something to validate that desire, and you do so by applying any perceived "good" in the world as being the wondrous work of your Jesus (anything good that people do for other people is always a favorite), while all that is "bad" is either the work of the devil or else some "higher good from Jesus that is beyond our limited mental capacity to comprehend." 
 
The problem is, you have yet to establish that any miracles are ever present at any time and for any reason, let alone that your chosen god would have exclusive rights to having performed such events, were they to actually occur, that is.  
 
Second, those religious leaders ("they") being referred to in Luke 16:31 are the Pharisees (and also Sadducees in Matt.16), and as such, they are not representative of the "crowds" and "people standing round" witnessing all these alleged miraculous events and "believing" as a result!  Even you must know, Amanda, that the Pharisees are portrayed in the gospels as opposing Jesus at every turn, seeing him as a threat to their authority (Mark 3:6; 7:1; 10:2; Matt. 12:24; 15:1-2; 16:6-12; 23:1; John 11:47-48; 12:19, among others).  They embodied the old establishment that was to be replaced by the new--that is, the New Kingdom.   Simply stated, they are a strawman group (like Pharaoh in the Exodus fable) whose views of Mosaic law are set up specifically for Jesus to knock down and replace with his own "interpretations."  Indeed, Matthew 16:5-12 has Jesus explaining a previous parable to his disciples which was intended to convey how they are not to go by the teachings of the Pharisees and Sadducees! 
 
Even more telling is that there are some passages that give us a view as to why they did not, or rather could not, believe:

 

[NAB John 12:37] Although he (Jesus) had performed so many signs in their presence they did not believe in him, 38 in order that the word which Isaiah the prophet spoke might be fulfilled: "Lord, who has believed our preaching, to whom has the might of the Lord been revealed?" 39 For this reason they could not believe, because again Isaiah said 40 "He (the Lord) blinded their eyes and hardened their heart, so that they might not see with their eyes and understand with their heart and be converted, and I would heal them." (my emphasis)
So Jesus himself was "blind[ing] their eyes and harden[ing] their heart[s]" in order to prevent them from seeing and understanding!  I find it very interesting that Jesus would prevent from seeing, those that would supposedly be most helped by seeing... 
 
But even if it was the case that no signs were to be performed for these "religious leaders" (the Pharisees), as you claim, that still does not solve the problem of Saul, who was a Pharisee--oops (Phil. 3:5; Acts 23:6; 26:5), and his conversion following the divine incident on the road to Damascus!  If Paul can be given a "sign" (from Jesus himself, we are told) that is sufficient to allay all his skepticism, and indeed turn his hatred and persecution of Christians into apostleship in their cause, then why is it unreasonable to expect a "sign" from Jesus (e.g., seeing just one single child resurrected from the dead) in order to allay my own skepticism, and in turn make me into a devoted apostle for the Christian cause?
 
And what of Jairus? (Luke 8)  Wasn't he an "official of the synagogue"? (Mark 5:22; Luke 8:41)  Did not Jesus show him the ultimate "sign" by resurrecting his dead daughter from the dead?  In the story we are told that Jairus "threw himself down at Jesus's feet" and proceeded to "beg" that Jesus "come to his house, because his only daughter, who was about twelve years old, was dying."  And shortly thereafter we are informed that his daughter was dead (v.49).  And how does Jesus respond to this news?  Why he says to Jairus, "Do not be afraid; simply have faith and she will be well again." (v.50), after which Jesus goes to her and resurrects her ("Her spirit returned, and she stood up immediately" [v.55]).
 
And what of John's version of the Jairus story, the "royal official whose son lay ill in Capernaum"? (John 4:46-53)  It's interesting that after this man "begs" for Jesus to heal his son, Jesus responds with the same admonishments about needing to see "signs and wonders" in order to believe, but do we see Jesus refusing the request as he refuses the Pharisees?  Let's see:

[NRS John 4:46-53] Then he came again to Cana in Galilee where he had changed the water into wine. Now there was a royal official whose son lay ill in Capernaum. 47 When he heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee, he went and begged him to come down and heal his son, for he was at the point of death.  48 Then Jesus said to him, "Unless you see signs and wonders you will not believe." 49 The official said to him, "Sir, come down before my little boy dies." 50 Jesus said to him, "Go; your son will live." The man believed the word that Jesus spoke to him and started on his way.  . . . 53 The father realized that this was the hour when Jesus had said to him, "Your son will live." So he himself believed, along with his whole household.

The answer, of course, is an emphatic "NO," he does not deny the request, but rather performs the "miracle" as requested, almost as an afterthought.  It's important to note, here, that Jesus' constant irritation at having to do these healings and resurrections (ho-hum) was not because he didn't want to do them, so as to relinquish the suffering of the afflicted or their relatives (e.g., the anguish of the widowed mother over the death of her only son), but that he shouldn't have to do it; rather, any "true believer" should be able to perform such healings and resurrections all by himself, if he "only had faith!" 
 
So, whenever there were no "true believers" around to perform healings and resurrections (cf., Matt.17:14-21), it was evidently not an unreasonable request to ask of Jesus to perform the miracle himself!  Indeed, it wasn't unreasonable for his own disciples to make requests of him, and it certainly wasn't unreasonable for all the "people standing round," so why should it be so unreasonable for me to request just one "sign" in the form of just one single resurrection (either from Jesus himself or from any one of his "believing" flocks), as compared to the multitude of miracles that the disciples and "crowds" allegedly observed in order that they would "believe"?
 
Third, it is not prayers or requests to Jesus from myself that I am appealing to here in order to have a resurrection occur, but rather to those agonizing prayers and appeals (begging) to Jesus FROM BELIEVING CHRISTIAN PARENTS (or even non-believing parents--theologically it makes no difference in this case) who have lost a child through disease, SIDS, fires, car accidents, suicide, torture, murder, terrorist attacks, or any other gruesome end you can think of.  In my own experiences as a fire-paramedic, I have personally witnessed anguished parents pleading to God to "bring their [dead] child back to them!"  I went on a SIDS just a couple months ago, in fact, where the mother was pleading with Jesus, saying, "Oh Jesus, oh God, I just want my baby back!  Please, Please!"  She was inconsolable.  I also had a 2 year-old girl get burned to death because her five-year-old brother was playing with a lighter in their bedroom, caught the bed on fire, and then ran and hid, closing the bedroom door behind him (with his baby sister still in there).  The mother can be heard on the 9-1-1 tape pleading to God to save her baby, although, even by this time the baby had been virtually incinerated (the mother had already tried to reach her, but the flames held her back).  There are other examples I could cite from my own experiences, so I know that similar situations occur all the time across the U.S. and around the world.   
 
Would you be so naive as to suggest, Amanda, that there are no "widowed mothers" in the world today who have had their "only son" die? (Luke 7)  This story (funeral procession in City of Nain) is especially interesting because we are never told that the mother of the dead man was a follower of Jesus, or that she was even praying to God to have her son returned to her.  All we are told is that Jesus (accompanied by his disciples and a large crowd, plus all the townspeople in the City of Nain), when he "...saw her his heart went out to her, and he said, 'Do not weep.' ", after which Jesus resurrects the young man and "...restored him to his mother." (Luke 7:15b). 
 
I am simply requesting to be present when Jesus performs just one of these patented resurrections today on behalf of one of his grieving followers.  I want to be one among the "crowd" of "people" standing round in order that I may witness said resurrection, and "believe" and "be filled with awe" and "praise God" as a result of having seen!  (John 11:42, 12:17; Luke 7:11,12,16) 
 
So, Amanda, since you are a "True Christian" who "lives the Christian life" and are a "true believer," then perhaps you could demonstrate for me the reality of your claims of Christian truth, and have your heart "go out to" your friend, the one who's little boy drowned while she was talking on the phone, and "in Jesus' name" (John 14:13-14), resurrect her little boy from the dead!  But please let me know when you plan to go to his grave and exhume the body to perform the resurrection, because I would like to be "one among the crowd" present when this dramatic "miracle" happens!
 
Bruce Monson
Adherence to Life BEFORE Death